MyFox
 

douglaschick0's Blog

by douglaschick0 from Denver

Last Post 29 days, 7 hours Ago


Iraq Vietnam ParallelI read that Nike workers in Vietnam are unhappy about the working conditions at the Nike plant "in Vietnam" and have gone on strike twice. They claim that their $1 (U.S) a day is not enough for long work day, and they want more money and treated like human-beings, not slaves.

Was not this the start of the Vietnam War, French textile workers revolting because of harsh working conditions and slave wages? Did they not want to join the communist party to be liberated? And now the communist party is the largest manufacture of textiles in the world? Does this mean that the over 40,000 Americans that lost their lives, gave their lives for nothing? Will Iraq parallel Vietnam; no matter how long we are there it will ultimately revert back to the way it was?

And finally, does it matter whether we are there for 10 years or 100; can time mask or justify our loss of live and resources?

What is your opinion regarding this?

Douglas Chick
DouglasChick@gmail.com

6 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 6
Page 1 of 1
truth1 read my blog
Feb 20, 2008 | 5:31 AM

I think you need to expand on why Nike is in Nam. I believe it was Clinton that decided it was time for him to go their and give them favored trade status? Do the people of the country deserve what they got? I guess we need to ask the Dems why they cut funding and support allowing the Communist to take over the country.

drerunner read my blog
Feb 20, 2008 | 11:11 AM

lastly, we have been in Germany now for half a century ,why aren't the liberal elitist protesting that? We are also in England ,Kuwait ,japan , the Philippines and south Korea. All, except Kuwait , have been nearly 40 years of occupation by us!!! . Those countries don't complain and neither do the liberal elite,so why are they having such a hard time with Vietnam and now IRAQ? hmmmmm

bobnash
Feb 20, 2008 | 5:46 PM

It seems every time we interfere with another society, regardless of how good intentioned we are, it end in disaster.

ColbyDog read my blog view my photos
Feb 21, 2008 | 5:59 AM

I thought the Vietnam War began because of a conflict involving the US commitment to continue supporting French Imperialism and promising freedom to EDIT Chi Minh following his help during WWII... interesting that you think we went to war because of collective bargaining efforts...

EDIT Chi Minh actually went in front of the League of Nations to request protection and help turning Vietnam democratic like the nation he most revered... the USA. He had drafted his Constitution following ours... but was turned down and forced to seek help from USSR.

ColbyDog read my blog view my photos
Feb 21, 2008 | 5:59 AM

Also interesting that you find no correlation to the US Multinational Corporations rise to power on the bootstraps of American military, diplomatic and economic intervention. Are not the ones making money supporting the disposable labor of China, Iraq, Vietnam, Japan...etc... those same corporations? ... its always been our discretion that has brought about these wars... never some communist threat... its the same smoke and mirrors that BushCo is using today.

How do these wacky concepts of history get started anyway? Oh yeah, they are given merit through the mainstream media's repetition and purposeful tactic of manufacturing consent... and all while seemingly presenting a "liberal bias" ... Orwell and Goebbels are rolling in their graves.

MileHighPatriot read my blog view my photos
Feb 21, 2008 | 11:44 AM

Is there any correlation? Yes. Certain people are either capable, not capable, or unwilling to adopt our way of life (or basically the fundamentals of our Constitution). I don’t think Iraqis are up to the task of converting from being dictated to thinking for themselves, namely because their religion, Islam, is an integral part of their political philosophy. Fundamental Islam and democracy/republics cannot coincide. I don’t know that the Viet-Kong had a religious doctrine that they held high, but they were obviously more strident in their efforts. The people as a whole were not an industrial one, and therefore didn’t have the economic ambitions (which are of the strongest ambitions) the US hoped they’d have. Besides the religious aspect of Iraq, the same could be said about Iraqis. They sit on a bed of black gold, and they don’t even capture it.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




douglaschick0

My name is Douglas Chick, I am an IT director for a national healthcare group, and an author of computer books, and creator of the computer networking, www.TheNetworkAdministrat
or.com

Member Since: 1/25/2008