GJFlash's Blog

Charles Gibson, Is a very accomplished and straight foward, Execellent Interviewer. And your just upset because he put your little Candidate on the spot and she couldn't handle it. Get over it and don't blame the Intervierer for a poor performance on the behalf of the Poor litle Palin. If you can't take the Heat get out of the kitchen!

Karl, did you read the post? Did you follow the links? Here's a quote from Charles Krauthammer, who actually coined the phrase "Bush Doctrine":

"There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration — and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today."

Gibson is just another leftist smear merchant, read the facts and see for yourself. I helpfully posted some links for you above, please read them before first attempting debate.

"Is not" is a pretty lame retort, don't you think? I'll give you an equally educated response:

Is SO!


Hey, diz! "Palin has more nards than you and Gibson put together". Bwahahahahahah!
GO BRONCOS! Could be a good game today, although on a day like today I'd rather be under the down comforter spooning and snuggling.

Flash, give me a break. Who are you kidding with this drivvle? The media is beating up on poor Palin?

Rather than waste time crying foul, I suggest people look at the interview.

EVEN AFTER Charlie explained his question, she still couldn't answer.

The media is doing their job. VETTING HER.

Please make us a list of appropriate questions for him to ask.

Would you rather just accept her because she is a republican?

Charlie for doing his job. He didn't misreport. He didn't lie. He asked questions. He put pressure on her. What are you afraid of?

She will be one heart beat away from the presidency of the most powerful country on earth. You think she shouldn't have to handle an INTERVIEW?

Republicans said the SAME THING when Hillary was being vetted. Now all of a sudden, shame on the media for hurting poor Palin???

By all means, subject her to more. By all means subject McCain to more. By all means subject Obama to more and by all means subject Biden to more.

WELL DONE CHARLIE!

I did Read the post, and visited the Links! and stand firmly behind what to anyone who isn't apparently Repub. biased would see. The interview was fair and she couldn't answer the question.

Apparently you refuse to open your narrow mind and look for some real truth! you look for nothing but Republican propaganda.

Any news post that in any way is not in the Republican favor you can't handle it. And resort to Calling Obama by names that I guess you and your Republican coherts think are funny!

But in November what will you do when the Democrats take The White house and clean up the miserably Republican Failure!

I tried posting a little vid here for you guys, but it didn't work. So you'll have to go to my blog to see it. I think you'll really enjoy it gj. The rest of ya'll (as my spoon-man here would say), NOT SO MUCH! hehe

gjflash said: [Here's a quote from Charles Krauthammer, who actually coined the phrase "Bush Doctrine":

"There is no single meaning of the Bush doctrine. In fact, there have been four distinct meanings, each one succeeding another over the eight years of this administration — and the one Charlie Gibson cited is not the one in common usage today."]

Fair enough, but she didn't know any of them. Ignoring this, when he told her exactly what he wanted her to answer, she still couldn't.

To me, she appeared to be out of her league. Maybe she is a fast study and will do better the next time.

In any case, if she can't handle a reporter with more poise, how do you expect her to handle Putin?

These liberal kooks only see what they want and it is usually threw rose colored glasses, Palin could have parted the red sea and these defeatist would have bitched that she got her feet wet. Of course Obama can get off telepromter and start studdering like porky pig and leaving us askng ourselves (what the frig did he just say) and these weak minded socialist are pissing themselves. Thank God these nut jobs are being driven out into the public eye and America is sick of them and we are finally seeing the death of liberalism.

LIBERALS WILL DIE OFF DUE TO THE FACT THEY ARE ABORTING THEMSELVES.

Thanks, dizzee. Way to pull out some facts.

"Stick to the facts Flash. These Muslim scare tactics are beneath you"

Those aren't scare tactics, Sam. Those are facts. If they don't concern you, you should probably do a little more research.

Where did I stray from the facts? You went off on some weird rant about being able to read minds or something, kind of lost me there.

Where did I stray from the facts?

So what do you need to hear, Sam, in order for you to be able to sleep tonight?

Do you need to hear that McCain could have picked a more qualified person as his running mate?

Just wondering, because Biden said the EXACT SAME THING about Barry Hussein:

“Quite frankly, it (Hillary) might have been a better pick than me,” Biden said with a grin. “I mean that sincerely. She is first rate. So lets get that straight.”

Barack Obama’s most important decision of this election, and Biden - the candidate he selects - suggests HIMSELF that he wasn’t the right man for the job, and that Hillary Clinton would have been a better choice. Biden certainly has a credible viewpoint on this, wouldn't you say? I mean, this isn't GJFlash saying that Biden wasn't the right person for the job, this is BIDEN saying that Biden wasn't the right person for the job.


---

Do you feel like you're losing, Sam? Not just this argument, but the election in general? I'm only asking because the first sign of a liberal in defeat is the "playing of the race card". I'm not a racist, and I won't tolerate being called one. Lose with dignity, or don't play at all.