UK's Brown makes fact-finding visit to Iraq
By Ross Colvin 2 hours, 1 minute ago
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Britain's next prime minister, Gordon Brown, arrived in Iraq on Monday for a fact-finding visit as he weighs Britain's future involvement in a four-year-old war that has angered voters and led to calls for a speedy pullout.
It is his first visit since being confirmed as the successor to
Tony Blair, whose popularity waned over his support for the U.S.-led war. Aides to Brown said he wanted to "look and learn" before taking office on June 27. "This is very much an assessment more than anything else, a fact-finding trip," Brown, currently Britain's finance minister, told reporters traveling with him.
Brown has said he wants to suggest new ideas but has ruled out an immediate pullout of British troops. That has not stopped the British media speculating he may speed up the withdrawal of troops to assuage public anger.
He has always accepted responsibility for the cabinet decision to invade Iraq, but has also said mistakes were made in the aftermath of the invasion.
His visit comes as the size of the British force in Iraq is being reduced by about 1,500 soldiers to 5,500 troops.
Brown, who was accompanied by Defense Minister Des Browne, is due to hold talks with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and President Jalal Talabani, the top British general in Iraq, U.S. commander General David Petraeus and the U.S. ambassador.
Brown said in his talks with Maliki he would discuss national reconciliation between Iraq's warring sides and would want to hear suggestions about how to move the process forward.
"On political reconciliation I want to know how they are going to move forward, and if I don't have suggestions from them I will put suggestions to them," he said.
Thousands of U.S. and Iraqi troops have been deployed in Baghdad, epicenter of sectarian violence, to crack down on Shi'ite and Sunni Arab militants and buy time for Maliki's government to reach political compromises to form a real powersharing government with minority Sunni Arabs and Kurds.
RECONCILIATION, ECONOMY
Washington is demanding movement in key areas, such as revenue-sharing oil law, provincial elections and constitutional reforms. But analysts say the Shi'ite-led coalition government is weak and divided and incapable of meeting these benchmarks without external pressure.
Nearly 30,000 extra U.S. troops have been sent to Iraq for the crackdown as British troops in the more stable Shi'ite south have begun reducing their numbers. But U.S. officials say they are confident Brown will not pull British troops out early.
British forces have handed over security responsibility to Iraqis in three of the four provinces they were in. The remaining southern province of Basra is due to be transferred in the coming months.
Brown said he would also talk to Maliki about the economy. With no letup in sight in the violence, unemployment and inflation are surging and infrastructure crumbling.
"They are not short of money to be allocated to infrastructure, the problem is the actual spending of it," said Brown, who guided Britain through an uninterrupted 10 years of economic growth.
Insurgents are attacking Iraq's infrastructure in their continuing campaign against U.S. forces and the Iraqi government, hitting bridges, oil pipelines and other key installations.
A suicide car bomb attack on a bridge overpass south of Baghdad late on Sunday killed three U.S. soldiers and wounded six more, a U.S. military spokesman, Lieutenant-Colonel Randy Martin, said on Monday.
The soldiers, who had been manning a checkpoint, were killed when part of the span collapsed. The attack took place near Mahmudiya, 30 km (20 miles) south of Baghdad in an area notorious for attacks by al Qaeda insurgents.
"I believe there were folks that were on or near the bridge span that collapsed. Folks were dug out of portions of the bridge that collapsed," Martin said.
(Additional reporting by Paul Tait in Baghdad, and David Clarke in London)
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 4 |
|
|
Abunai
Jun 11, 2007 | 9:56 AM |
|||||
|
historian
Jun 11, 2007 | 3:18 PM |
|||||
|
Abunai
Jun 12, 2007 | 8:58 AM |
|||||
|
connot
Jun 16, 2007 | 4:36 PM |
|||||
|
|||||
I use to go by the name “bush is evil.” My opinion, he is. But the name seemed to be a bloody bit too much for the last few remaining Bush supporters to handle. They all cried foul! Disrespect! They labeled me as a Democrat even though I never once promoted any democrat in my posts nor have I ever bankrolled or endorsed the democrats as my party. This bush coterie tried everything they could to constrain my intellective pursuits. They failed. I believe that Bush has to expiate his wrongdoings. I voted for both Bush’s. How was I to know? I was as naive as the hanger-on Bush supporters of today. I began to probe all bush allegations. At first, I refused to believe. I was in denial, again, much like the Bushies of today. To my disbelief, I realized that it was all true. I was crushed. I told myself I’d never vote again. Bruised, I picked myself up and brushed me-self off. Now, my goal is too help the last of the Bushies to become aware through thought reform. It's a tough job as many are just good old country boys and gals that won't give in to the truths that their President has been less than honest with those who put their trust in him. And, they have to be open enough to want to change when just possibly it could be for the better. Many Bushies think that it's not American like to want better for our nation and our planet in these turbulent times. And that brings me to why I am changing my screen-name. Maybe out of respect to the ones the name angers, is why I am doing it. For them. I don’t hate anyone. I love my country. But whatever the reason was, BUSHISEVIL distracted the Bush loyalist from my re-education process. Rather than intelligently discuss my post, some angrily got caught up in a name. A name that of no-one they have ever met; No clue or knew anything about. All this flap because of an immature obsession over a screen name and all after a screen name that they perceived an evident personality from. They could have physic abilities. Do you think so? Well, maybe now that I call myself, "Historian" their anger might subside enough to allow them to intelligently debate the issue at hand rather than rage with anger from ignorance. My statement only applies to those who were guilty of and most of the Bush supporters who frequent this site are good, hard working Americans smart enough to not let a name push their buttons.
Member Since: 3/25/2007