MyFox
 

historian's Blog

by historian from Denver

Last Post 552 days, 20 hours Ago


Any politician with political pursuits, from today on---will all become cheerless for a leader such as a disconsolate Bush who drinks himself to sleep as now he knows he's just gonna be a bad mark in future History books.  Bush's boat is speedily taking on water. Yes, folks; Bush's Presidency is no more than a gross, emoungous, liberal- festering boil ready to pop and squirt oozing decay in the face of all Cons who showed their loyalty to the spoken truths of a deceiving and distorted now just a shell of a man.  It's like you were not warned, my little Cons. A suggestion for all Cons: "Write it off a poor judgement and continue on your misguided lives.  Eat crow and hold your head as high as your pride will let you. We all make mistakes at times. And only a fool politician would commit political suicide by continuing to side with such a disgrace of a President whose sins and greed overtook  his duty to serve with integrity,  the People of America. --Boy am I liking the daily developments on Bush's downfall because the quicker he's out of office; the sooner more of our Troops will come home alive.

Another senior Republican breaks with Bush on Iraq Thu Jul 5, 2007 6:45PM EDT    Photo

By Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush's Iraq war policy continued to hemorrhage support in the U.S. Senate as another senior Republican called on Thursday for a new strategy that would start to bring troops home.

A day after Bush appealed to Americans to be more patient with the unpopular war, six-term New Mexico Sen. Pete Domenici, who is up for re-election next year, urged a new course.

"I am unwilling to continue our current strategy," Domenici, who serves on the Senate's defense appropriations subcommittee, said in a statement.

"I do not support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq or a reduction in funding for our troops. But I do support a new strategy that will move our troops out of combat operations and on the path to coming home," Domenici said.

Domenici joined the ranks of influential Republican lawmakers who recently have broken with Bush over the 4-year-old conflict in Iraq, declaring themselves unable to keep backing a war that has no end in sight after the deaths of 3,590 U.S. troops.

"I have carefully studied the Iraq situation and believe we cannot continue asking our troops to sacrifice indefinitely while the Iraqi government is not making measurable progress to move its country forward," Domenici said.

Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, declared last week that Bush's strategy was not working and troops should start leaving. Ohio Sen. George Voinovich, another Republican, urged "gradual military disengagement."

Bush has shown no public sign of changing course. On Wednesday, he asked the country for "more patience, more courage and more sacrifice" in Iraq during an Independence Day address at a National Guard air base.

The White House has played down the Republican defections while anti-war forces have new hope for a coalition in the Senate that would force a change in U.S. war strategy.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat who voted to authorize the war in 2002 but then soured on the conflict, said on Thursday that senators like Domenici, Lugar and Voinovich now had to back their criticism with votes for withdrawal.

Reid said they would have a chance beginning with a defense policy bill that will be brought to the Senate floor next week.

Domenici said he backed a bipartisan Senate proposal that may be debated as part of the defense policy bill and would create the conditions for a possible drawdown of U.S. troops by March.

The plan by Sens. Ken Salazar, a Colorado Democrat, and Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, embraces recommendations made last December by the Iraq Study Group.

Republican leaders have urged lawmakers to wait until September, when the top U.S. commander in Iraq makes his progress report, before pushing for change in Iraq policy. But Domenici said he could see now that things were not improving.

13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
TaliaDaGOOD read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2007 | 1:56 AM

so glad to see you back historian!!! We missed you!!

Freshhorse read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2007 | 8:31 AM

..yea like a “tooth ache” ....I get it you hate Bush , hate Republicans and hate America (in revers order!) but I do mis the old day (4 years ago) when a fact or two would occasionally wander into a Liberal rant (only to die of loneliness!)

MileHighPatriot read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2007 | 10:08 AM

AT LEAST he left his opinion instead of just cutting and pasting.

There's no use attacking you for attacking Bush. You like to follow the screeching crowd with the banners painted in red -we know.

The reason conservatives are hated by anyone is because they're thought of as insensitive. The reason liberals are hated by anyone is because they're pu ssies.

"Boy am I liking the daily developments on Bush's downfall because the quicker he's out of office; the sooner more of our Troops will come home alive."

Are you serious? Who told you this? Did you dream this up one night after reading the last edition of Rosie? Just because Bush will be out of office doesn't mean the troops will come home. Democrats and Republicans lie to us all the time... Democrats moreso. Democrats do it in your face. I can't beleive the stuff they feed people. Pelosi promised so much about how Congress/Senate would be ran, and the results people would see, AND that the troops would come home right away... LIE.

WHO'S MISGUIDED??

Hawkeye read my blog
Jul 6, 2007 | 12:38 PM

Thank you,,Historian ( or whatever incarnation you‘re going by today ) ...
Thank You for defining Liberalism in ways that a Conservative never could...
I freely admit,,Just as I claim that YOU know Nothing of Conservatism I likewise cannot fathom what it IS to be a LIBERAL, not totally..
Oh SURE,,I can point out the LIES and DISTORTIONS by which a Liberal makes his presence known but to REALLY KNOW what it is to BE such a miserable and offensive person...
NOT A CHANCE...
As such I would NEVER have been able to demonstrate NOT only the PURE unadulterated HATRED that YOU feel but ALSO the WILLINGNESS to EMBRACE that HATRED like a LONG LOST LOVER....
This is as demonstrated by YOUR Glee at the perceived misfortunes of others ( real or imagined ) as it is in the poisonous venom that you spew…

Thanks again for giving ME yet another reason to celebrate during this time of our Nation's Birthday..For I am eternally grateful that I have had the GREAT fortune in life to have escaped the bitter clutches of Liberalism...

Ridehog read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2007 | 3:41 PM

Just another STUPID BLOG writen by a STUPID MORON. Hey round mouth why the name change I thought you did that every two months not every 3 weeks. I guess you relize you burned your stupid name cannednuts out and your hoping someonE new will debate with you. YOUR AN IDIOT HISSYSISSYNANCYBOY.

slgps read my blog view my photos
Jul 6, 2007 | 7:07 PM

Deary me, it is the other half of the tag team. Do you ceremoniously change underwear when you change names. Talia, were you snorting the white substance in the road? Were the Guiness people there to document the bigest coke line in history? Can you and your Siamese twin stop calling us CONS. Dead give away.

Flippy read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2007 | 1:08 AM

Of course he himself saw Bush drinking, otherwise, how could he testify, or even accuse, as he has done?
Another brain dead moron, that gets a direct thought daily from the totally biased liberal media, and deserves not even a passing thought other than that. Why waste your time?

Flippy read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2007 | 1:15 AM

I mean, give me a break. This is a person like so many others, that believes what the liberal democratic media tells them to believe. They do not have a mind of thier own. So sad.

Flippy read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2007 | 1:21 AM

After reading your "about me" I am here to tell you, there are more Bush supporters than you can even imagine. It is not an accident that he won twice! Airhorn!

TaliaDaGOOD read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2007 | 7:21 PM

Nope, no snorting here! I just love when historian blogs. It's FUN! Besides, I think it's funny that he relates conservatives with Bush. Just because I am in fact a conservative does NOT mean I support or condone Bush in ANY way, shape or form!

Powerball read my blog view my photos
Jul 7, 2007 | 8:54 PM

What a cuck nut

Abunai read my blog view my photos
Jul 8, 2007 | 10:47 AM

Well... No need to add to this topic.... seems the conservative minority aka SILENT MAJORITY has covered it well!

I think its great that we are just months away from primary elections, and liberals are STILL fighting Bush!! I have a 9 year old cat that still enjoys chasing its tail too as if it was something new to be delt with! LOL!

Psst.. dirty little secret all us "cons" need to watch is that this too can be a ploy for us to focus on the Bush bashing crowd while Hillary gets under the wire from public spotlight. You libs can distract all you like, but I and others are on vigilant watch here... Your socialist card carring liberal candidates will not sneek out the side door...

slgps read my blog view my photos
Jul 8, 2007 | 3:48 PM

Where ya been Powerball?

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




historian

I use to go by the name “bush is evil.” My opinion, he is. But the name seemed to be a bloody bit too much for the last few remaining Bush supporters to handle. They all cried foul! Disrespect! They labeled me as a Democrat even though I never once promoted any democrat in my posts nor have I ever bankrolled or endorsed the democrats as my party. This bush coterie tried everything they could to constrain my intellective pursuits. They failed. I believe that Bush has to expiate his wrongdoings. I voted for both Bush’s. How was I to know? I was as naive as the hanger-on Bush supporters of today. I began to probe all bush allegations. At first, I refused to believe. I was in denial, again, much like the Bushies of today. To my disbelief, I realized that it was all true. I was crushed. I told myself I’d never vote again. Bruised, I picked myself up and brushed me-self off. Now, my goal is too help the last of the Bushies to become aware through thought reform. It's a tough job as many are just good old country boys and gals that won't give in to the truths that their President has been less than honest with those who put their trust in him. And, they have to be open enough to want to change when just possibly it could be for the better. Many Bushies think that it's not American like to want better for our nation and our planet in these turbulent times. And that brings me to why I am changing my screen-name. Maybe out of respect to the ones the name angers, is why I am doing it. For them. I don’t hate anyone. I love my country. But whatever the reason was, BUSHISEVIL distracted the Bush loyalist from my re-education process. Rather than intelligently discuss my post, some angrily got caught up in a name. A name that of no-one they have ever met; No clue or knew anything about. All this flap because of an immature obsession over a screen name and all after a screen name that they perceived an evident personality from. They could have physic abilities. Do you think so? Well, maybe now that I call myself, "Historian" their anger might subside enough to allow them to intelligently debate the issue at hand rather than rage with anger from ignorance. My statement only applies to those who were guilty of and most of the Bush supporters who frequent this site are good, hard working Americans smart enough to not let a name push their buttons.

Member Since: 3/25/2007